Teaching ‘Qualitative Research Methodology’ Course to Quantitatively Oriented PhD Students: A Practical Action Research Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2025.512-
Downloads
How to Cite
Abstract
This practical action research study reports how the doctoral-level Qualitative Research Methodology course offered by a Vietnamese university evolved over four years. Since the students were quantitatively oriented and of mixed disciplinary backgrounds, they struggled with the course immensely. In particular, they were highly skeptical of the qualitative research methodology. By assigning more discipline-appropriate reading materials and changing the material assignment mechanism over four intervention cycles, the students responded increasingly positively to the course and gradually overcame their prejudice against it. In addition, popular press books seemed to create a meaningful common space between the students and the instructor. While the interventions brought about more positive student learning experiences, the instructor found them painful, and some students remained skeptical of the course. This study is useful for those professors who teach research methods courses in Ph.D. programs, especially when the students struggle with the courses.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
Alenezi, A. (2020). The role of e-learning materials in enhancing teaching and learning behaviors. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(1), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.1.1338
Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges, and perceived performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(3), 468-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979
Bergman, M. M. (2011). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in Mixed Methods Research and Design. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(4), 271-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811433236
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: a guide for practitioners (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863466
Byrom, N. C., Dinu, L., Kirkman, A., & Hughes, G. (2022). Predicting stress and mental well-being among doctoral researchers. Journal of Mental Health (Abingdon, England), 31(6), 783-791. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2020.1818196
Connell, G. L., Donovan, D. A., & Chambers, T. G. (2016). Increasing the Use of Student-Centered Pedagogies from Moderate to High Improves Student Learning and Attitudes about Biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(1), ar3-ar3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-03-0062
Coronel Llamas, J. M., & Boza, Á. (2011). Teaching research methods for doctoral students in education: learning to enquire in the university. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.492136
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36.
De Sordi, J. O. (2024). Qualitative research methods in business: Techniques for data collection and analysis (1st ed. 2024.). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50323-8
Donmoyer, R. (2024). The paradigm wars reconsidered: Looking for a legacy. In Handbook of Critical Education Research (1st ed., pp. 39-55). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003141464-4
Galdas, P. (2017). Revisiting bias in qualitative research: Reflections on its relationship with funding and impact. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748992
Gardner, P. (2021). Contemplative pedagogy: Fostering transformative learning in a critical service-learning course. The Journal of Experiential Education, 44(2), 152-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825920952086
Garner, M., Kawulich, B., & Wagner, C. (2016). Teaching research methods in the social sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315611921
Gin, L. E., Wiesenthal, N. J., Ferreira, I., & Cooper, K. M. (2021). PhDepression: Examining how graduate research and teaching affect depression in life sciences PhD students. CBE Life Sciences Education, 20(3), ar41-ar41. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-03-0077
Given, L. M. (2017). It’s a New Year…So let’s stop the paradigm wars. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917692647
Glorieux, A., Spruyt, B., te Braak, P., Minnen, J., & van Tienoven, T. P. (2024). When the student becomes the teacher: Determinants of self-estimated successful PhD completion among graduate teaching assistants. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241245090
Grace, F. (2011). Learning as a path, not a goal: Contemplative pedagogy - Its principles and practices. Teaching Theology & Religion, 14(2), 99-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9647.2011.00689.x
Hindley, C., Knowles, D., & Ruth, D. (2022). Teaching research methods: Introducing a psychogeographical approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(6), 1321-1333. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.15
Hodge, H. N. (2013). Ancient futures: learning from Ladakh. Random House.
Humphreys, M. (2006). Teaching qualitative research methods: I’m beginning to see the light. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 1(3), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640610718770
Le, M., Pham, L., Kim, K., & Bui, N. (2021). The impacts of supervisor - PhD student relationships on PhD students’ satisfaction: A case study of Vietnamese universities. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.4.18
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46(4), 868-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
Lewthwaite, S., & Nind, M. (2016). Teaching Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Expert Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2016.1197882
Lindsay, S. (2015). What works for doctoral students in completing their thesis? Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.974025
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Sage Publications.
Maxwell, J. A. (2021). Why qualitative methods are necessary for generalization. Qualitative Psychology (Washington, D.C.), 8(1), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000173
McAllister, M., John, T., Gray, M., Williams, L., Barnes, M., Allan, J., & Rowe, J. (2009). Adopting narrative pedagogy to improve the student learning experience in a regional Australian university. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 32(1-2), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.32.1-2.156
Mingers, J. (2004). Paradigm wars: ceasefire announced who will set up the new administration? Journal of Information Technology, 19(3), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000021
Ministry of Education and Training (2021). Document No. 1943/BGDĐT-GDĐH dated May 13, 2021, regarding the guidance on implementing doctoral and master’s training using state budget sources according to Decision No. 89/QD-TTg dated January 18, 2019, of the Prime Minister in 2021 and 2022.
Mir, R., & Mir, A. (2002). The organizational imagination: From paradigm wars to praxis. Organizational Research Methods, 5(1), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102005001007
Mulisa, F. (2022). When does a researcher choose a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed research approach? Interchange (Toronto. 1984), 53(1), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09447-z
Munoz-Najar Galvez, S., Heiberger, R., & McFarland, D. (2020). Paradigm wars revisited: A cartography of graduate research in the field of education (1980-2010). American Educational Research Journal, 57(2), 612-652. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219860511
Myers, M. D. (2019). Qualitative research in business and management. Sage Publications.
Nguyen, T. T. H., Pham, H., Vuong, Q., Cao, Q., Dinh, V., & Nguyen, D. D. (2021). The adoption of international publishing within Vietnamese academia from 1986 to 2020: A review. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1340
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). Taking the Q out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality & Quantity, 39(3), 267-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-1670-0
Pallas, A. M. (2001). Preparing education doctoral students for epistemological diversity. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030005006
Pappa, S., Elomaa, M., & Perälä-Littunen, S. (2020). Sources of stress and scholarly identity: The case of international doctoral students of education in Finland. Higher Education, 80(1), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00473-6
Pegues, H. (2007). Of paradigm wars: Constructivism, objectivism, and postmodern stratagem. The Educational Forum (West Lafayette, Ind.), 71(4), 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720709335022
Phan, H. P. (2024). Narratives of ‘delayed success’: A life course perspective on understanding Vietnamese international students’ decisions to drop out of PhD programmes. Higher Education, 87(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00992-9
Pivovarova, M., Powers, J. M., & Fischman, G. E. (2020). Moving beyond the paradigm wars: Emergent approaches for education research. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), vii-xvi. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20909400
Polio, C. (2012). No paradigm wars please. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 294-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.05.008
Pruss, H., Franz, C. E., & Walsh, S. M. (2024). Teaching research methods through a community-based research project: Connecting theory and practice to make it “real” for students. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2024.2358222
Schmuck, R. A. (2009). Practical action research: a collection of articles (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.
Schweisfurth, M. (2015). Learner-centred pedagogy: Towards a post-2015 agenda for teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.10.011
Shan, Y. (2022). Philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. Philosophy Compass, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12804
Shepherd, C., & Challenger, R. (2013). Revisiting paradigm(s) in management research: A Rhetorical analysis of the paradigm wars. International Journal of Management Reviews: IJMR, 15(2), 225-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12004
Small, M. L., & Calarco, J. M. (2022). Qualitative literacy: a guide to evaluating ethnographic and interview research. University of California Press.
Staller, K. M. (2013). Epistemological boot camp: The politics of science and what every qualitative researcher needs to know to survive in the academy. Qualitative Social Work: QSW: Research and Practice, 12(4), 395-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325012450483
Sullivan, H., & De Bruin, E. (2023). Teaching undergraduates research methods: A “methods lab” approach. PS, Political Science & Politics, 56(2), 309-314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522001366
Terosky, A. L., Baker, V. L., & Sun, J. C. (Eds.). (2023). A Practical Guide to Teaching Research Methods in Education: Lesson Plans and Advice from Faculty. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/b23320
The Prime Minister of Vietnam (2019). Decision No. 89/QD-TTg dated January 18, 2019 on approving the Proposal for enhancing competencies of lecturers and administrators of higher education institutions meeting requirements for radical changes in education and training during the period of 2019 - 2030.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (Third edition.). ASCD.
Twinley, R., & Letherby, G. (2022). The doctoral journey as an emotional, embodied, political experience: Stories from the field (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429330384
Usher, W., & McCormack, B. A. (2021). Doctoral capital and well-being amongst Australian PhD students: exploring capital and habitus of doctoral students. Health Education (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 121(3), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-11-2020-0112
Wagner, C., Garner, M., & Kawulich, B. (2011). The state of the art of teaching research methods in the social sciences: towards a pedagogical culture. Studies in Higher Education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 36(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903452594
Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The Art of Coding and Thematic Exploration in Qualitative Research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45-72.
Wollast, R., Aelenei, C., Chevalère, J., Van der Linden, N., Galand, B., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., & Klein, O. (2023). Facing the dropout crisis among PhD candidates: the role of supervisor support in emotional well-being and intended doctoral persistence among men and women. Studies in Higher Education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 48(6), 813-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2172151
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vietnam Journal of Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
