How Did Vietnamese Teachers Observe Lessons? Active, Passive, And Middle Voices in Classroom Observation


  • Atsushi Tsukui Social Development Department, International Development Center of Japan, Tokyo, Japan


How to Cite

Tsukui, A. (2022). How Did Vietnamese Teachers Observe Lessons? Active, Passive, And Middle Voices in Classroom Observation. Vietnam Journal of Education, 6(Special Issue), 58–69.


This study aims to identify the characteristics of Vietnamese teachers’ classroom observations. The analysis was conducted using data from the ten teachers who struggled to introduce the new curriculum during the 2000s. The analysis applied from the literature on the teachers’ video reflection revealed that those who participated in weekly sessions of Lesson Study for Learning Community (LSLC) tended to identify students’ knowledge formation better than those who did not participate in the lesson study. The second qualitative analysis, focusing on effective and attitudinal aspects in observation, indicated that the teachers in LSLC schools could accept and respond to the classroom event by positing themselves in the seat of actors. The discussion is devoted to the application of the concept of middle voice to the LSLC teachers’ observation, to examine a possible extension of the literature which mainly relies on teachers’ active cognitive processes.


Download data is not yet available.


Admiraal, W., Hoeksma, M., van de Kamp, M. T., & van Duin, G. (2011). Assessment of teacher competence using video portfolios: Reliability, construct validity, and consequential validity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1019-1028.

Arhar, J., & Buck, G. (2000). Learning to look through the eyes of our students: action research as a tool of inquiry. Educational Action Research, 8(2), 37-41.

Baecher, L., & Kung, S. (2011). Jumpstarting novice teachers’ ability to analyze classroom video: Affordances of an online workshop. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(1), 16-26.

Benveniste, É. (1971). The active and the middle voice in the verb. In Problems in general linguistics (145-171). University of Miami.

MOET (2018). Circular No.32/2018/TT-BGDDT dated December 26, 2018 of the Ministry of Education and Training on the promulgation of the General Education Program.

Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.

The Government of Vietnam (2000). Report submitted to the parliament on advocacy of renovation and textbook revision in the general education.

Coles, A. (2012). Using video for professional development: the role of the discussion facilitator. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(3), 165-184.

Colestock, A., & Sherin, M. G. (2009). Teachers’ sense-making strategies while watching video of mathematics instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17, 7-29.

Craig, C. J. (2010). Reflective practice in the professions: Teaching. In N. Lyons (Ed.), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry (189-214). Springer.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

Danielson, C. (2012). Observing classroom practice. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 32-37.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 523-545.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. John Wiley & Sons.

Do, T. N. (2015). New teaching methods are never ever easy. Giáo Dục Vietnam (Online).

Eisner, E. W. (1976). Educational connoisseurship and criticism: Their form and functions in educational evaluation. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 10(3/4), 135-150.

Eisner, E. W. (1979). The use of qualitative forms of evaluation for improving educational practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(6), 11-19.

Eisner, E. W. (1995). Preparing teachers for schools of the 21st century. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(3), 99-111.

Fadde, P. J., Aud, S., & Gilbert, S. (2009). Incorporating a video-editing activity in a reflective teaching course for preservice teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 31(1), 75-86.

Frank, C. R., & Uy, F. L. (2004). Ethnography for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(3), 269-283.

Frederiksen, J. R., Sherin, M. G., Sipusic, M., & Wolfe, E. W. (1998). Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching. Educational Assessment, 5(4), 225-297.

Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41-67.

Hammer, D. (2000). Teacher inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (184-215). American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Jaworski, B. (1990). Video as a tool for teachers’ professional development. British Journal of In-Service Education, 16(1), 60-65.

Kleinknecht, M., & Schneider, J. (2013). What do teachers think and feel when analyzing videos of themselves and other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 33(1), 13-23.

Koenen, A. K., Spilt, J. L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2022). Understanding teachers’ experiences of classroom relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103573.

Kokubun, K. (2017). Tyudotai no sekai: sekinin to ishi no kokogaku [The world of the middle voice: Archeology of responsibility and the will]. Igaku Shoin.

Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. University of Chicago Press.

Marsh, B., & Mitchell, N. (2014). The role of video in teacher professional development. Teacher Development, 18(3), 403-417.

Masats, D., & Dooly, M. (2011). Rethinking the use of video in teacher education: A holistic approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1151-1162.

Nemirovsky, R., DiMattia, C., Ribeiro, B., & Lara-Meloy, T. (2005). Talking about teaching episodes. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(5), 363-392.

Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.

Richardson, V., & Kile, R. S. (1999). Learning from video cases. In M. Lundeberg & B. B. Levin (Eds.), Who learned what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (121-136). Erlbaum.

Rodgers, C. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230-253

Saha, L., & Dworkin, A. (2009). International handbook of research on teachers and teaching. Springer.

Sato, M. (2000). Jyugyo wo kaeru gakko ga kawaru [Changing lesson, changing school]. Shogakkan.

Sato, M. (2006). Gakko no Tyosen [Challenges of School]. Tokyo: Shogakkan.

Sato, M., Akita, K., & Iwakawa, N. (1993). Practical thinking styles of teachers: A comparative study of expert and novice thought processes and its implications for rethinking teacher education in Japan. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(4), 100-110.

Sato, M., Iwakawa, N., Akita, K., & Yoshimura, T. (1991). Practical thinking styles of teachers: A lesson of descriptive inquiry on thought processes. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, University of Tokyo, 31, 183-200.

Saito, E., Khong, T. D. H., & Tsukui, A. (2012). Why is school reform sustained even after a project? A case study of Bac Giang Province, Vietnam. Journal of Educational Change, 13(2), 259-287.

Saito, E., Murase, M., Tsukui, A., & Yeo, J. (2014). Lesson Study for Learning Community: A Guide to Sustainable School Reform. Routledge.

Saito, E., & Tsukui, A. (2008). Challenging common sense: Cases of school reform for learning community under an international cooperation project in Bac Giang Province, Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(5), 571-584.

Saito, E., Tsukui, A., & Tanaka, Y. (2008). Problems on primary school-based in-service training in Vietnam: A case study of Bac Giang province. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(1), 89-103.

Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163-183.

Sherin, M. G., & Russ, R. S. (2014). Teacher noticing via video: The role of interpretive frames. In B. Calandra & P. J. Rich (Eds.), Digital video for teacher education: Research and practice (3-20). Routledge.

Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475-491.

Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37.

Tsukui, A., Saito, E., Sato, M., Michiyama, M., & Murase, M. (2017). The classroom observations of Vietnamese teachers: mediating underlying values to understand student learning. Teachers and Teaching, 23(6), 689-703.

van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596.

van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276.

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91.




How to Cite

Tsukui, A. (2022). How Did Vietnamese Teachers Observe Lessons? Active, Passive, And Middle Voices in Classroom Observation. Vietnam Journal of Education, 6(Special Issue), 58–69.