Peer Interaction by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Students in a Decision Making Task

Authors

  • Linh Khanh Thi Vo Nha Trang National College of Pedagogy, Vietnam
  • Huong Hoai Pham Le Hue University, University of Foreign Languages, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2022.136

How to Cite

Vo, L. K. T., & Le, H. H. P. (2022). Peer Interaction by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Students in a Decision Making Task. Vietnam Journal of Education, 6(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2022.136

Abstract

Tasks are frequently used in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classes. The sociocultural theory considers tasks to mediate learners through language. However, how a specific task can embrace such a claim remains an issue to explore. This study was set out to address the questions of how a decision making task stimulated interaction among peers and how it mediated knowledge construction. Thirty EFL junior college students forming fifteen pairs participated in the study. The recorded videos of their decision-making task performance were used for data analysis. The findings reveal that cumulative talk was present in all pairs’ recordings. While exploratory talk was not generated as frequently as cumulative talk, it tended to conduce to more language learning and knowledge construction. The findings also indicate that with the same task, peers interacted in different patterns and mediated each other by providing immediate assistance with English vocabulary and ideas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2017). Patterns of interaction in young EFL learners’ pair work: The relationship between pair dynamics and vocabulary acquisition. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 23(3), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-08

Chen, W. (2018). Patterns of pair interaction in communicative tasks: The transition process and effect on L2 teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 72(4), 425-434. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy015

Coultas, V., & Booth, P. (2019). Exploratory talk and Task-based Learning: A case study of a student’s learning journey on an MA (Education) English Language Teaching Course. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 26(1), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2018.1545109

Daniels, H. (2015). Mediation: An expansion of the socio-cultural gaze. History of the Human Sciences, 28(2), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695114559994

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Apple (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Edwards, J. A. (2005). Exploratory talk in peer groups: exploring the zone of proximal development. Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME 4. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/18139/

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Foster, P., & Ohta, A. M. Y. S. (2005). Negotiation for Meaning and Peer Assistance in Second Language Classrooms. In Applied Linguistics, 26, 402-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami014

Kasper, G. (2001). Four Perspectives on L2 Pragmatic Development. Applied Linguistics, 22, 502-30.

Kim, Y. H. (2016). Pair interaction among adult EFL learners: A South Korean case study. University of London.

Kos, T. (2013). Peer interactions in mixed-age EFL secondary school classrooms. Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/84540/

Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning (Vol. 78). Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. In Biological Therapy (Ukraine) (pp. 197-220). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02916194

Le, P. H. H. (2004). A Socio-cultural analysis of learning English in unassisted and assisted peer group. Victoria University of Wellington.

Le, P. H. H. (2007). The more knowledgeable peer, target language use, and group participation. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(2), 333-354.

Li, D. (2009). Is there a role for tutor in group work: Peer interaction in a Hong Kong EFL classroom. HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies, 13, 12-40.

Lin, P. S. S., & Samuel, M. (2018). Students’ roles during peer response sessions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 55-63.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.111.479.1009-a

Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137-168.

Mercer, N., & Fisher, E. (1998). How do teachers help children to learn. Learning Relationships in the Classroom, 2, 111.

Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based Learning in the Asian Context (P. Robertson & J. Jung, Eds.). Asian EFL Journal Press.

Ogilvie, G., & Dunn, W. (2010). Taking teacher education to task: Exploring the role of teacher education in promoting the utilization of task-based language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(2), 161-181.

Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying Sociocultural Theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-Learner collaborative interaction in the Zone of Proximal Development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0zs5j7ps

Ohta, A. S. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 4, 51-78.

Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: learning Japanese. In Asian Languages & Literature. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Polo, C., Lund, K., Plantin, C., & Niccolai, G. (2015). Analyzing exploratory talk as a Socio-Cognitive practice: Identity, group argumentation, and class debate quality. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01208319

Roberson, A. P. (2014). Patterns of interaction in peer response: the relationship between pair dynamics and revision outcomes (Georgia State University). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/alesl_diss/34

Saadi, Z. K. (2016). Meaning making, agency, and languaging in dialogic interactions on academic writing tasks: A sociocultural discourse analysis. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED566408

Sadow, S. A. (1982). Idea Bank: Creative Activities for the Language Class. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Understanding peer interaction. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.01int

Shima, C. (2008). Fluidity of Peer Interaction in a Japanese Language Classroom. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(1), 126-139. Retrieved from http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v5sp12008/shima.htm#Swain 2000

Storch, N. (2001a). An investigation into the nature of pair work in an ESL classroom and its effect on grammatical development (The University of Melbourne). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/38809

Storch, N. (2001b). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 29-53.

Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-113). Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, 95.

Van De Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher - student interaction: a decade of research. Educ Psychol Rev, 22, 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

Villamil, O. S., & De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 51-75.

Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599

Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1997). A dialogical framework for researching peer talk. In Computers and Talk in the Primary Classroom (pp. 49-65). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Wells, G. (2004). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Zheng, C. (2012). Understanding the learning process of peer feedback activity: An ethnographic study of exploratory practice. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 109-126.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-28

How to Cite

Vo, L. K. T., & Le, H. H. P. (2022). Peer Interaction by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Students in a Decision Making Task. Vietnam Journal of Education, 6(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2022.136

Issue

Section

Articles