Teachers’ participation in curriculum development: a case study from an English preparatory program at a tertiary institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2020.16-
Downloads
How to Cite
Abstract
The higher requirement of English competency among learners at the tertiary level has called for constant curriculum development in English training programs, especially in English instructed undergraduate programs. With the purpose to explore the phenomenon of teachers’ participation in the curriculum development process, this study employed a qualitative instrumental case study of an English preparatory program. The participants of the study were 8 English instructors in the English Preparatory Program at International School, Vietnam National University, Hanoi. The data of the research were collected by using a semi-structured interview and then thematically coded. The results from the interview show a high level of teacher’s willingness to be involved in most staged of the curriculum development process. The main activities they actually participated in the examined project were selecting content, sequencing content, and organizing learning experience. Feasible suggestions to increase teachers’ voices in the decision-making process were also recorded.
Downloads
References
Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106-107.
Baş, G. & Şentürk, C. (2019). Teachers’ voice: Teacher participation in curriculum development process. Inquiry in Education, 11(1), 1-31.
Bolstad, R. (2004). School-based curriculum development: Principles, processes, and practices. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Carl, A. (2005). The “voice of the teacher” in curriculum development: A voice crying in the wilderness. South African Journal of Education, 25(4), 223-228.
Erss, M., Mikser, R., Löfström, E., Ugaste, A., Rõuk, V., & Jaani, J. (2014). Teachers’ views of curriculum policy: The case of Estonia. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62, 393-411. doi:10.1080/
2014.941786
Glickman, C. D., Gordon Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2013). The basic guide to supervision and instructional leadership (3rd ed., pp. 250-262). Boston: Pearson.
Handler, B. (2010). Teacher as curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom-based practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 3(3), 32-42.
Jadhav, M. S., & Patankar, P. S. (2013). Role of teachers’ in curriculum development for teacher education. Paper presented at the National Conference on Challenges in Teacher Education, Physical Education and Sports, Kolhapur, India.
Kelly, A. V. (2009). Curriculum Theory and Practice (6th Edition). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Klein, M. F. (1991). A conceptual framework for curriculum decision making. In M. Klein (Ed.), The politics of curriculum decision making: Issues in centralizing the curriculum (pp. 24-41). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Lunenberg, F., & Ornstein, A. C. (2008). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (2003). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Messick, R. G., & Reynolds, K. E. (1991). Middle level curriculum in action. New York, NY: Longman.
Mullick, H. (2013). Voices imprisoned within classrooms: A critical approach to curriculum development and teacher voice on a preparatory year English language program in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Bilingual & Multilingual Teachers of English, 1(2), 37-48.
Oliva, P. F. (2008). Developing the curriculum (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Oloruntegbe, K. O. (2011). Teachers’ involvement, commitment and innovativeness in curriculum development and implementation. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 2, 443-449.
Posner, G. J. (2003). Analyzing the curriculum (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Syomwene, A. (2020). Curriculum theory: Practice and functions. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(1), 326-337. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3718433
UNESCO International Bureau of Education (2011). Towards a quality education for all: the national curriculum framework 2011. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000212722?posInSet=1&queryId=
e5867cf3-4276-4168-a345-0909605119d8
UNESCO International Bureau of Education (2013). Glossary of curriculum terminology. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000223059?posInSet=2&queryId=20e6eead-5e88-4e0a-b67a-ef31428cc6f7
UNESCO, (2014). EFA Global Monitoring Report 2013/4 - Teaching and Learning: Achieving Quality for All. Available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002256/ 225660e.pdf
Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(4), 121-140.
Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (2007). Curriculum development: A guide to practice (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Zohrabi, M. (2014). Promoting teacher development through an interactive approach to curriculum development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 2025-2034. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.638
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
