Non-English Majors’ Perceptions of English Proficiency Standards and CEFR-V in Tertiary Education in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2023.281-
Downloads
How to Cite
Abstract
Vietnam’s education system has made significant efforts to enhance foreign language proficiency, particularly in English, across all levels of training. In recent years, although many educational policies and projects, typically National Foreign Language Project have been promulgated and widely applied, there are still gaps and limitations. One of them is the lack of research on the beliefs and understanding of students who are most deeply affected by the English graduation standard policies. This paper aims to examine non-English major undergraduates’ understanding of the CEFR-V (a Vietnamese version of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages) and their beliefs about the current implementation of the English proficiency standards to university students in Vietnam. The study collected data from 122 students from a large university in Vietnam. Descriptive statistics indicate that while the participants possess sufficiently positive beliefs about the implementation of the national proficiency standards for undergraduate students, there are still concerns about standardization and differentiation. Additionally, the students are found to have limited knowledge and low usage of the CEFR-V. Thereby, some suggestions were made to improve the foreign language policy and optimize students' learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
Abdi, H., & Asadi, B. (2015). A Synopsis of Researches on Teachers’ and Students’ Beliefs about Language Learning. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 3(4), 104-114.
Al-Shammakhi, F., & Al-Humaidi. S. (2015). Challenges Facing EFL Teachers in Mixed Ability Classes and Strategies Used to Overcome Them. World Journal of English Language, 5(3), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v5n3p33
Al-Zu’be, A. F. M. (2013). The difference between the Learner-centred approach and the Teacher-centred approach in Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Educational Research International, 2(2), 24-31.
Barman, B. (2013). Shifting Education from Teacher-centered to Learner-centered paradigm [Conference session]. International Conference on Tertiary Education at Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning - a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change Magazine, 27(6), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672
Benson, P. (2009). Making sense of autonomy in language learning. In Pemberton, R., Toogood, S., & Barfield, A. (Eds.), Maintaining Control: Autonomy and Language Learning (pp. 13-26). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622099234.003.0002
Block, D., & D. Cameron. (Eds.). (2002). Globalization and Language Teaching. London: Routledge.
Chyung, S. Y., Roberts, K., Swanson, I., & Hankinson, A. (2017). Evidence-Based Survey Design: The Use of a Midpoint on the Likert Scale. Performance Improvement, 56(10), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21727
Council of Europe (2001). A Common European Framework of Reference for Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press. https://rm.coe.int/1680459f97
Dornyei, A. (2003). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27(4), 557-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(99)00050-0
Huong, T. N. N., & Hiep, P. H. (2010). Vietnamese teachers’ and students’ perceptions of Global English. Language Education in Asia, 1(1), 48-61.
Kohonen, V. (2012). Developing autonomy through ELP-oriented pedagogy: exploring the interplay between shallow and deep structures in a major change within language education. In Kuhn, B., & Cavana, M. L. P. (Eds.), Perspective from the European Language Portfolio: Learner autonomy and self-assessment (pp. 8-22). London and New York: Routledge.
McKay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an International Language: Rethinking goals and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moreno, S. (2015). Differentiated Instruction: Strategies for English Language Learners Listening Comprehension Development. Master’s Thesis, Bridgewater State University.
Neuert, C., Meitinger, K., Behr, D., & Schonlau, M. (2021). Editorial: The Use of Open-ended Questions in Surveys. Methods, data, analyses: a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology (mda), 15(1), 3-6. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/73172
Nguyen, D. A. (2016). The Challenges of Implementing the National Proficiency Standards with Ethnic Minority Students: An exploratory study at Tay Bac University. Master’s Thesis, Vietnam National University, Hanoi.
Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589-613. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588214
Prime Minister of SRV (2008). Teaching and Learning Foreign Languages in the National Education System, Period 2008-2020. Issued under Decision No. 1400/QĐ-TTg signed by the Prime Minister of the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
Prime Minister of SRV (2017). Teaching and Learning Foreign Languages in the National Education System, Period 2017-2025. Issued under Decision No. 2080/QĐ-TTg signed by the Prime Minister of the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-ability classrooms. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Vietnam MOET. (2014). Six-level framework for foreign language proficiency in Vietnam. Issued under Circular No. 01/TT-BGDĐT by the Vietnam’s Minister of the Ministry of Education and Training.
Vietnam MOET. (2018). General Education Curriculum. Issued under Decision No. 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT by the Vietnam’s Minister of the Ministry of Education and Training.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Vietnam Journal of Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.