Exploring Student Assessment Practices in Vietnamese Teacher Training Universities through Naturalistic Inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2025.426-
Downloads
How to Cite
Abstract
Qualitative research has gained increasing attention in Vietnamese education, yet the application of Naturalistic Inquiry to study educational assessment practices remains relatively underexplored. This ethnographic study investigates the beliefs, values, and attitudes of lecturers and academic managers toward student assessment practices in Vietnamese teacher education universities, employing Lincoln and Guba’s (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry paradigm. Through in-depth interviews and document analysis, the research uncovers a spectrum of perspectives - from traditional, summative-focused approaches to reform-oriented, formative practices - shaped by institutional, cultural, and personal factors. The findings highlight the tension between entrenched norms and emerging progressive ideals, offering insights into how these dynamics influence assessment practices critical to teacher education. By demonstrating the methodological rigor of Naturalistic Inquiry through its operational characteristics and trustworthiness criteria, this study not only enriches understanding of student assessment practices within Vietnam’s educational context but also offers novice researchers a practical model for applying this approach in educational studies.
Downloads
References
Agostinho, S. (2005). Naturalistic Inquiry in e-learning research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(1), 13-26.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-75.
Boud, D. (2007). Reframing Assessment as if Learning Were Important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term (pp. 14-25). London & New York: Routledge.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and Content Analysis of Oral and Written Material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology (pp. 389-444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Brown, G. T., Gebril, A., & Michaelides, M. P. (2019). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A global phenomenon or a global localism. Frontiers in Education, 4(16), 1-13.
Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from Award-winning Practice. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Chen, Q., May, L., Klenowski, V., & Kettle, M. (2014). The Enactment of Formative Assessment in English Language Classrooms in Two Chinese Universities: Teacher and Student Responses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(3), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2013.790308
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 523-545.
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A guide to methods. SAGE Publications.
Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers Colleges, Columbia University.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Gonzalez, L. E., Brown, M. S., & Slate, J. R. (2008). Teachers Who Left the Teaching Profession: A Qualitative Understanding. Qualitative Report, 13(1), 1-11.
Government (2012). Decision made by the Prime Minister numbered 711/2012/QĐ-TTg dated 13/06/2012 on approving the development strategies of national education from 2011-2020.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Sage Publications, Inc.
Hager, P., & Butler, J. (1996). Two Models of Educational Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(4), 367-378.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hayden, M., & Le, N. L. (2013). The Education System in Vietnam: A Need to Improve Quality. In L. P. Symaco (Ed.), Education in South-east Asia (pp. 323-344). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Irani, E. (2018). The Use of Videoconferencing for Qualitative Interviewing: Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations. Clinical Nursing Research, 28(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773818803170
Lam, Q. T. (2006). The implementation of the credit system in the world and in Vietnam. https://www.vnu.edu.vn/home/?C1635/N1800/Ve-viec-ap-dung-hoc-che-tin-chi-tren-the-gioi-va-o-Viet-Nam.htm
Le Nguyen, C., Parry, S., & Hayden, M. (2023). The state of discipline-based research cultures at two leading research-oriented universities in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(1), 36-49.
Le, K. A. T., Hayden, M., & Nhan, T. T. (2019). Development of the higher education sector in Vietnam. Quality assurance in Vietnamese higher education: Policy and practice in the 21st century, 1-23.
Lichtman, M. (2023). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Routledge.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Cannella, G. S. (2004). Dangerous discourses: Methodological conservatism and governmental regimes of truth. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 5-14.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G (2005). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163-188). Sage Publications Ltd.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
London, J. D. (2011). Education in Vietnam. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Luong, G. (2016). Achieving Change in Student Assessment in Vietnamese Teacher Training Institutions. Unpublished PhD thesis. Southern Cross University.
Luong, T. H. G., Parry, S., & Hayden, M. (2018). Achieving change in student assessment policies and practices: a pressing challenge for Vietnam’s higher education system. Journal of International Comparative Education, 7(2), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.14425/jice.2018.7.2.83
Marton, F., Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. (1984). The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
McCornac, D. C., & Phan, T. C. (2005). Pedagogical Suggestions for Teaching Business and Economics in Vietnam. Journal of Education for Business, 81(2), 81-84.
Moore, C., & Teather, S. (2013). Engaging Students in Peer Review: Feedback as Learning. eCULTURE, 5(1), 27-36.
Nguyen, C. H., & Shah, M. (2019). Quality Assurance in Vietnamese Higher Education: Policy and Practice in the 21st Century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nguyen, D. N., & Pham, H. Q. (2022). Key Pedagogical Universities and Restructuring Teacher Education Institutions: A case study of Vietnam. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 11(03), 858-872.
Nguyen, D. T., Ho, T. H., & Doan, T. N. (1996). History of Vietnamese Education before August Revolution 1945. Education Publisher.
Nguyen, K. D., & McInnis, C. (2002). The Possibility of Using Student Evaluations in Vietnamese Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 8(2), 151-158.
Nguyen, P. M., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2005). Cooperative Learning vs Confucian Heritage Culture’s Collectivism: Confrontation to Reveal some Cultural Conflicts and Mismatch. Asia Europe Journal, 3(3), 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-005-0008-4
Nguyen, T. H. T. (2013). Assessing Student Learning in Selected Social Sciences and Humanities Undergraduate Programmes at Universities in the UK and Vietnam: A Comparative Case Study. (Unpublished PhD thesis), University of Nottingham.
Nguyen, T. M. H., & Hall, C. (2016). Changing views of teachers and teaching in Vietnam. Teaching Education, 28(3), 244-256.
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Olbertz-Siitonen, M. (2021). Practical applications of Naturalistic Inquiry in intercultural education. Journal of Praxis in Higher Education, 3(2), 52-78.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of educational research, 62(3), 307-332.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rowntree, D. (1987). Assessing students: How shall we know them? London: Kogan Page.
Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (2002). Scientific research in education. National Academies Press.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Yen, P. H., Thi, N. A., Thuy, P. T., Tra, N. H., & Thu, H. T. A. (2023). Assessment Strategies in Outcome-based Education: Preferences and Practices Among University Lecturers in Vietnam. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(10), 416-432. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.10.23
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vietnam Journal of Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
