An Application of the Boyer Model in Developing Business Faculty in Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP) Accreditation in Vietnamese Membership Institutes

Hieu Minh Vo; Anh Bao The Luu; Nhung Hong Nguyen

doi:10.52296/vje.2021.33

Authors

Hieu Minh Vo University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Anh Bao The Luu Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Vietnam
Nhung Hong Nguyen Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2021.33

Downloads
PDF

How to Cite

Vo, H. M., Luu, A. B. T., & Nguyen, N. H. (2021). An Application of the Boyer Model in Developing Business Faculty in Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP) Accreditation in Vietnamese Membership Institutes. Vietnam Journal of Education, 5(2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2021.33

Download Citation

Abstract

The Council for Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP) is an accrediting body that assesses the quality and integrity of business-related training programs at educational institutions. As ACBSP applied the Boyer model in evaluating, categorising the business faculty, forcing the faculties to develop the quality of their human resources indirectly, improved education quality. This paper was written to reflect how the Boyer model was applied in business faculties in Vietnamese member institutes and how the institutes are changing to fulfill the standards. The methodology that would be used to analyze the secondary data is descriptive analysis. The data is collected under the acceptance of those institutes. The primary data could be deep interviews with faculty managers, faculty members, board of management of the institutes. In order to be more convincing, the research would also pick some ACBSP members as empirical studies. The findings of the research are the trends of the faculties and the lesson withdrawn from their changing experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACBSP (2011). Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs. Retrieved from https://acbsp.org/page/accreditation-overview

Boyer, E. L. (1996). From scholarship reconsidered to scholarship assessed. Quest, 48(2), 129-139.

Campbell, C., Kanaan, S., Kehm, B., Mockiene, B., Westerheijden, D. F., & Williams, R. (2000). The European University: A handbook on institutional approaches to strategic management, quality management. European policy and academic recognition. Torino: European Training Foundation.

Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273-290.

Dommeyer, C., Baum, P., Chapman, K., & Hanna, R. (2002). Attitudes of Business Faculty Towards Two Methods of Collecting Teaching Evaluations: Paper vs. Online. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 27(5), 455-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009320

El-Khawas, E. (1998). Accreditation’s role in quality assurance in the United States. Higher Education Management, 10(3), 43-56.

Garnett, F., & Ecclesfield, N. (2011). Towards a framework for co-creating open scholarship. Research in learning technology, 19.

Giraud, A. (2001). Accreditation and the quality movement in France. Quality In Health Care, 10(2), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.10.2.111

Glasser, W. (1990). The quality school (1st ed.). Perennial Library.

Glassick, C. E. (2000). Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Academic Medicine, 75(9), 877-880.

Granitz, N., Koernig, S., & Harich, K. (2008). Now It’s Personal. Journal Of Marketing Education, 31(1), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308326408

Haakstad, J. (2001). Accreditation: The new quality assurance formula? Some reflections as Norway is about to reform its quality assurance system. Quality In Higher Education, 7(1), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320120045102

Harvey, L. (1999). Evaluating the evaluators’ opening keynote of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education. Santiago, Chile, May.

Kaplan, A. (2018). A school is “a building that has four walls…with tomorrow inside”: Toward the reinvention of the business school. Business Horizons, 61(4), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.010

Kristoffersen, D., Sursock, A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (1998). Manual of Quality Assurance: Procedures and Practice. Torino: European Training Foundation.

Massy, W., Wilger, A., & Colbeck, C. (2000). Overcoming “hollowed” collegiality: Departmental cultures and teaching quality. In D. DeZure (Ed.). Learning from Change: Landmarks in teaching and learning from Change magazine 1969-1999, 28-32. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

MOET (2007). Decision 65/2007/QD-BGDDT (signed on 19th May 2007) with regulations on evaluation standards of higher education.

MOET (2021). List of training programs that have completed self-assessment reports, accredited according to domestic standards. Retrieved from https://moet.gov.vn/giaoducquocdan/khao-thi-va-kiem-dinh-chat-luong-giao-duc/Pages/Default.aspx?ItemID=7222

National Assembly of Vietnam (2018). Decree 34/2018/QH14 (signed on 19th November 2021) amending and supplementing a number of articles of the Law on Higher Education.

Pham, H. T., & Nguyen, C. H. (2019). History of quality assurance in Vietnamese higher education. In C. H. Nguyen & M. Shah (Eds.), Quality assurance in Vietnamese higher education: policy and practice in the 21st century, p.59-80. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sursock, A. (2000). Towards accreditation schemes for higher education in Europe?. CRE Workshop, 8-9.

Tran, N. T., & Vu, P. A. T. (2019). Quality assurance in Vietnamese higher education: policy and practice in the 21st century. Fifteen years of accreditation in Vietnam, p.97-120. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Trieschmann, J., Dennis, A., Northcraft, G., & Nieme, A. (2000). Serving Constituencies In Business Schools: M.B.A. Program Versus Research Performance. Academy Of Management Journal, 43(6), 1130-1141. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556341