Predatory Journals: How Should We Understand and Evaluate Them?

Authors

  • An Binh Thai Nguyen Institute for Research on Education and Knowledge Transfer, Thanh Do University, Vietnam
  • Hiep-Hung Pham Institute for Research on Education and Knowledge Transfer, Thanh Do University, Vietnam
  • Tien-Trung Nguyen University of Education, Vietnam National University, Vietnam
  • An Van Le Nguyen Vietnam Journal of Education, Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2025.718

How to Cite

Nguyen, A. B. T., Pham, H.-H., Nguyen, T.-T., & Nguyen, A. V. L. (2025). Predatory Journals: How Should We Understand and Evaluate Them?. Vietnam Journal of Education, 9(3), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2025.718

Abstract

Predatory journals have emerged as a growing challenge to academic integrity worldwide, driven by increasing publication pressures and ongoing changes in scholarly publishing. Although numerous lists, warning signs, and checklists have been proposed to identify such journals, the lack of consensus and standardized approaches has created confusion among researchers and institutions. This paper is presented as an opinion piece that reflects on existing debates and practical experiences related to predatory publishing. Drawing on the literature and the authors’ analytical perspectives, the paper discusses common misunderstandings surrounding predatory journals and highlights limitations of list-based evaluation approaches. It argues for a more cautious, context-sensitive, and process-oriented approach to assessing journals, emphasizing transparency, peer-review practices, editorial governance, and publisher credibility. By offering reflective insights rather than empirical findings, this article aims to stimulate critical discussion and support more informed decision-making in journal evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

An Binh Thai Nguyen, Institute for Research on Education and Knowledge Transfer, Thanh Do University, Vietnam

 

 

Hiep-Hung Pham, Institute for Research on Education and Knowledge Transfer, Thanh Do University, Vietnam

 

   

Tien-Trung Nguyen, University of Education, Vietnam National University, Vietnam

 

 

An Van Le Nguyen, Vietnam Journal of Education, Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam

 

   

References

Beall, J. (2010). Predatory Open-Access Scholarly Publishers. The Charleston Advisor, 12(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.12.1.50

Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179a

Beall, J. (2015). Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers. Scholarly Open Access. http://crescent.education/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Criteria.pdf

Beall’s List of Potential Predatory Journals and Publishers s(n.d.). https://beallslist.net

Chandra, A., & Dasgupta, S. (2024). Predatory Journals: What the researchers and authors should know. The American Journal of Medicine, 137(6), 470-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.02.015

Cheng, X., Wang, H., Tang, L., Jiang, W., Zhou, M., & Wang, G. (2024). Open peer review correlates with altmetrics but not with citations: Evidence from Nature Communications and PLoS One. Journal of Informetrics, 18(3), 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101540

Cobey, K. D., Lalu, M. M., Skidmore, B., Ahmadzai, N., Grudniewicz, A., & Moher, D. (2018). What is a predatory journal? A scoping review. F1000Research, 7, 1001. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15256.2

COPE Council (2019). COPE Guidelines: Author fees and waivers - English. https://doi.org/10.24318/CkhGNJ8Q

Cukier, S., Helal, L., Rice, D. B., Pupkaite, J., Ahmadzai, N., Wilson, M., Skidmore, B., Lalu, M. M., & Moher, D. (2020). Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: A systematic review. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01566-1

Dadkhah, M., & Bianciardi, G. (2016). Ranking predatory journals; solve the problem instead of removing it! Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 6(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.15171/apb.2016.001

Grudniewicz, A., Moher, D., Cobey, K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., Ardern, C., Balcom, L., Barros, T., Berger, M., Ciro, J. B., Cugusi, L., Donaldson, M. R., Egger, M., Graham, I. D., Hodgkinson, M., Khan, K. M., Mabizela, M., Manca, A., Lalu, M. M. (2019). Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature, 576(7786), 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y

Hansoti, B., Langdorf, M., & Murphy, L. (2016). Discriminating Between Legitimate and Predatory Open Access Journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17(5), 497-507. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.7.30328

Lewinski, A. A., & Oermann, M. H. (2018). Characteristics of E-Mail solicitations from predatory nursing journals and publishers. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 49(4), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20180320-07

Mouton, J., & Valentine, A. (2017). The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals. South African Journal of Science, 113(7/8), 9. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20170010

Nielsen, P., & Davison, R. M. (2020). Predatory journals: A sign of an unhealthy publish or perish game? Information Systems Journal, 30(4), 635-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12289

PLOS One (2021). Editorial and Peer Review Process. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/editorial-and-peer-review-process

Rapid peer review - IEEE Access (2023). IEEE Access. https://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/about-ieee-access/rapid-peer-review

Richtig, G., Berger, M., Lange‐Asschenfeldt, B., Aberer, W., & Richtig, E. (2018). Problems and challenges of predatory journals. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 32(9), 1441-1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15039

Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Maduekwe, O., Turner, L., Barbour, V., Burch, R., Clark, J., Galipeau, J., Roberts, J., & Shea, B. J. (2017). Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine, 15(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9

Shen, C., & Shah, L. (2023). Predatory publishing practices: what researchers should know before submitting their manuscript. Insights the UKSG Journal, 36. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.631

Spezi, V., Wakeling, S., Pinfield, S., Creaser, C., Fry, J., & Willett, P. (2017). Open-access mega-journals. Journal of Documentation, 73(2), 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2016-0082

Strinzel, M., Severin, A., Milzow, K., & Egger, M. (2019). Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: A Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis. mBio, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00411-19

Wang, P., You, S., Manasa, R., & Wolfram, D. (2016). Open Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: A web mining study of PEERJ authors and Reviewers. Journal of Data and Information Science, 1(4), 60-80. https://doi.org/10.20309/jdis.201625

Wood, K. E., & Krasowski, M. D. (2020). Academic E-Mail overload and the burden of “Academic spam.” Academic Pathology, 7, 2374289519898858. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289519898858

Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2014). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406-1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Nguyen, A. B. T., Pham, H.-H., Nguyen, T.-T., & Nguyen, A. V. L. (2025). Predatory Journals: How Should We Understand and Evaluate Them?. Vietnam Journal of Education, 9(3), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2025.718

Issue

Section

Perspectives