Fostering Mathematics Teaching Competence Through STEM-Oriented Education for General School Teachers in The Era of Digital Transformation: Theoretical Foundations and Framework Proposal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2026.895-
Downloads
How to Cite
Abstract
STEM-oriented instruction has become a core mandate for school teachers, especially mathematics teachers, whose subject plays a foundational role in developing students’ logical reasoning and problem-solving capacity. This paper examines the theoretical foundations of STEM-based mathematics teaching competence among school teachers in the digital era and proposes a conceptual framework for mathematics teacher professional development aligned with current educational reform trends. By synthesizing and analyzing contemporary theoretical approaches such as the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, Professional Learning Communities (PLC), and the Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DigCompEdu) proposed by Redecker (2017) this study develops a professional development model for mathematics teachers comprising: (1) core competencies integrating disciplinary knowledge, pedagogy, and technology; (2) experiential, collaborative, and practice-oriented learning processes; and (3) supportive conditions shaped by digital transformation and school learning cultures. In the proposed framework, TPACK is used to describe the knowledge base that mathematics teachers need for STEM-oriented teaching. DigCompEdu further clarifies how digital competence is involved in designing, organizing, and assessing learning activities. PLC provides the professional setting in which teachers collaboratively plan lessons, examine classroom evidence, receive feedback, and adjust their teaching practices. The proposed framework clarifies the relationship between teachers’ STEM-teaching competence and their digital competence, while suggesting a development pathway that integrates pedagogical innovation grounded in STEM, TPACK, and PLC approaches with digitally enhanced instructional practices. The findings offer both theoretical and practical implications for improving professional development, strengthening mathematics teachers’ competencies, and fostering a digitally responsive STEM education ecosystem.
Downloads
References
Abdi, A. I., Idris, N., & Karakose, T. (2024). Tracing the evolution of STEM education: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1457938. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1457938
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Desimone, L. M., & Stuckey, D. (2014). Sustaining professional development. In L. E. Martin, S. Kragler, D. J. Quatroche, & K. L. Bauserman (Eds.), Handbook of professional development in education: Successful models and practices, PreK-12 (pp. 467-482). Guilford Press.
DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org/our-work/artificial-intelligence-in-education/
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406
Lynham, S. A. (2002). The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422302043002
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
OECD (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030: A series of concept notes. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
OECD (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en
Prime Minister of Vietnam (2022). Decision No. 131/QĐ-TTg dated January 25, 2022 approving the project “Strengthening the application of information technology and digital transformation in education and training for the period 2022-2025, with orientation to 2030” [Quyết định số 131/QĐ-TTg ngày 25 tháng 01 năm 2022 phê duyệt Đề án “Tăng cường ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin và chuyển đổi số trong giáo dục và đào tạo giai đoạn 2022-2025, định hướng đến năm 2030”].
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu (Y. Punie, Ed.). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Tuong, H. A., Nam, P. S., Hau, N. H., Tien, V. T. B., Lavicza, Z., & Houghton, T. (2023). Vận dụng các thực hành giáo dục STEM nhằm nâng cao hiệu quả dạy học môn Toán ở Việt Nam: Phát triển năng lực giải quyết vấn đề thực tiễn và các kỹ năng thế kỷ XXI cho học sinh [Utilising STEM-based practices to enhance mathematics teaching in Vietnam: Developing students' real-world problem solving and 21st century skills]. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1790
UNESCO (2019). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers (Version 3). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
UNESCO (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
World Bank (2021). Teaching and learning in Southeast Asia: Evidence from the region. World Bank.
World Economic Forum (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vietnam Journal of Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








