Negotiating Power and Teacher-leader Relationships: Evidence from Lower Secondary Schools in Central Vietnam

Authors

  • Thang Dinh Truong Quang Tri Teacher Training College, Vietnam; Quang Binh University, Vietnam
  • Hung Van Bui Vinh University, Vietnam
  • Hien Ngoc Nguyen Vinh University, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2026.786

Supporting Agencies

  • This work was supported by the Vietnam Ministry of Education [Grant number B2024-TDV-02].

How to Cite

Truong, T. D., Bui, H. V., & Nguyen, H. N. (2026). Negotiating Power and Teacher-leader Relationships: Evidence from Lower Secondary Schools in Central Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Education, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2026.786

Abstract

In education systems shaped by hierarchical traditions and collectivist cultural values, school leadership is not only exercised through formal authority but also through the everyday negotiation of relationships, trust, and professional legitimacy. This study examines how power dynamics shape teacher-leader relationship building in Vietnamese lower secondary schools, with attention to how principals navigate authority within a hierarchical and collectivist cultural context. Drawing on a post-structuralist lens, the research employed a qualitative multiple-case study design. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews with 18 participants (principals, deputy principals, and teachers) across three public schools. The findings show that hierarchy remains a strong structuring force, but authority is continuously produced and legitimised through relational and moral work. Principals combined formal decision-making power with relational strategies - such as recognition, informal dialogue, and community-building - to foster trust and collaboration, while simultaneously shaping the terms under which teacher voice and dissent could be expressed. Cross-case comparison further indicates that leadership practices were contextually negotiated, resulting in different configurations of hierarchical, hybrid, and more participatory approaches. The study contributes to educational leadership scholarship by offering a culturally grounded account of how authority and relationality intersect in everyday leadership practice, with implications for leadership development and policy design in hierarchical and collectivist education systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539002

Blase, J. (1991). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation. Corwin Press.

Ball, S. J. (2012a). Foucault, power, and education. Routledge.

Ball, S. J. (2012b). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. Routledge.

Belsey, C. (2022). Poststructuralism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475

Biesta, G. J. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

Brassett, J. (2023). Post-structuralism. In J. C. W. Pevehouse & J. A. Goldstein (Eds.), International Organization and Global Governance (pp. 205-215). Routledge.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Cheng, K. M., & Wong, K. C. (1996). School effectiveness in East Asia: Concepts, origins and implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239610148269

Clarke, S., & O’Donoghue, T. (2017). Educational leadership and context: A rendering of an inseparable relationship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2016.1199772

Collinson, D. (2006). Rethinking followership: A post-structuralist analysis of follower identities. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.12.005

Combs, J. P., Edmonson, S., & Harris, S. (2018). The trust factor: Strategies for school leaders. Routledge.

Cunliffe, A. L., & Eriksen, M. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64(11), 1425-1449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711418388

English, F. W. (2007). The art of educational leadership: Balancing performance and accountability. SAGE.

Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205

Fletcher, J. K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 647-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.07.004

Foucault, M. (1980). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Cornell University Press.

Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181

Foucault, M. (2020). Power/knowledge. In The new social theory reader (pp. 73-79). Routledge.

French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Institute for Social Research.

Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a Culture of Change. Jossey-Bass.

Gregory, J. L. (2017). Trust relationships in schools: Supporting or subverting implementation of school-wide initiatives. School Leadership & Management, 37(1-2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1293639

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Hallinger, P., & Chen, J. (2015). Review of research on educational leadership and management in Asia: A comparative analysis of research topics and methods, 1995-2012. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535744

Hallinger, P., & Truong, D. T. (2014). Exploring the contours of context and leadership effectiveness in Vietnam. Leading and Managing, 20(2), 43-59.

Hallinger, P., & Truong, D. T. (2016). “Above must be above, and below must be below”: enactment of relational school leadership in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(4), 677-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9463-4

Handford, V., & Leithwood, K. (2013). Why teachers trust school leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 194-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311304706

Ho, L., & Dimmock, C. (2023). Changing teachers’ beliefs and practices towards learner-centred education: experiences and lessons from Vietnam’s education system reforms. Practice, 5(3), 200-219.

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

Hosking, D. M. (2011). Telling tales of relations: Appreciating relational constructionism. Organization Studies, 32(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610394296

Karp, T. (2022). Leadership is a practice shaped by everyday actions in messy organisational realities. In Leadership-Advancing Great Leaders and Leadership. IntechOpen.

Lau, W. K., Nguyen, L. D., Pham, L. N., & Cernas-Ortiz, D. A. (2023). The mediating role of harmony in effective leadership in China: From a Confucianism perspective. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(3), 546-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2021.1948216

Law, W. W. (2012). Educational leadership and culture in China: Dichotomies between Chinese and Anglo-American leadership traditions? International Journal of Educational Development, 32(2), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.04.007

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership. The Essentials of School Leadership, 31, 43.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

London, J.D. (2023). Adoption, Adaption, and the Iterative Challenges of Scaling Up in Vietnam: Policy Entrepreneurship and System Coherence in a Major Pedagogical Reform. Research on Improving Systems of Education. https://doi.org/10.25446/oxford.23686650

MacNeil, A. J., Prater, D. L., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120701576241

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Moos, L. (2020). Denmark: Contracts in Danish educational governance. In H. Ärlestig & O. Johansson (Eds.), Educational Authorities and the Schools: Organisation and Impact in 20 States (pp. 19-36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38759-4_2

Nguyen, P. T., Nguyen, K. N. V., Nguyen, H. T., & Nguyen, T. Q. (2025). Confucian Educational Thought and Its Relevance to Contemporary Vietnamese Education. Philosophies, 10(3), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030070

Niesche, R., & Gowlett, C. (2015). Advocating a post-structuralist politics for educational leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 372-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.976930

Niesche, R., & Gowlett, C. (2019). Critical perspectives in educational leadership: A new ‘theory turn’?. In R. Niesche & C. Gowlett (Eds.), Social, critical and political theories for educational leadership (pp. 17-34). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8241-3_2

Normand, R. (2016). France: Between civil service and republican ethics-the statist vision of leadership among French principals. In H. Ärlestig, C. Day, & O. Johansson (Eds.), A Decade of Research on School Principals: Cases from 24 Countries (pp. 357-374). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23027-6_17

O’Donoghue, B. T. (2013). Face’s consequences: The impact of “face” on leadership, management and follower behaviour in Malaysia. In . Rajasekar & L.-S. Beh (Eds.), Culture and Gender in Leadership: Perspectives from the Middle East and Asia (pp. 161-181). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311573_9

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.

Raelin, J. A. (2016). Imagine there are no leaders: Reframing leadership as collaborative agency. Leadership, 12(2), 131-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715014558076

Selvarajah, C., Meyer, D., & Donovan, J. (2013). Cultural context and its influence on managerial leadership in Thailand. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(3), 356-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2012.714630

Shengnan, L., & Hallinger, P. (2021). Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 214-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219896042

Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social Anthropology, 23(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12098

Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

Truong, T. D., & Hallinger, P. (2017). Exploring cultural context and school leadership: conceptualizing an indigenous model of có uy school leadership in Vietnam. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(5), 539-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1105388

Truong, T. D., Hallinger, P., & Sanga, K. (2017). Confucian values and school leadership in Vietnam: Exploring the influence of culture on principal decision making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215607877

Truong, T. D., & Sanga, K. (2016). Conflict management in Vietnamese educational leadership. The International Journal of Organizational Diversity, 16(2), 1.

Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007

Wang’ombe, T. (2023). The Role of Educational Leadership in Fostering a Positive School Culture and Enhancing Teacher Retention. European Journal of Education, 1(1), 31-43.

Watts, L., & Hodgson, D. (2019). Social Justice Theory and Practice for Social Work: Critical and Philosophical Perspectives. Springer.

Webb, O. (2021). Enacting relational leadership through restorative practices. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 67(2), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/ajer.v67i2.68603

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Truong, T. D., Bui, H. V., & Nguyen, H. N. (2026). Negotiating Power and Teacher-leader Relationships: Evidence from Lower Secondary Schools in Central Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Education, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2026.786

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)